You may find solace in r/Vystopia, friend <3

I can grant that bivalves are ethically ambiguous, but you're right, eggs certainly are not. The commenter you responded to diminishes the harsh reality by saying:

>This attitude of 'summary judgment of all animal agriculture' is unhelpful.

Likely so they don't have to think about the consequences of their consumer choices & continue with the status quo, likely not even going so far as to only consume the things they deem okay to continue consuming; though of course I hope I'm wrong. Hopefully they look into it more & come to right conclusions on matters of ethics & environment.

The following is some insight into the human psychology of eating animals & why there tends to be so much push back against veganism/plant-based eating in general:

• Why people eat animals in today's society

• Cognitive dissonance and social conditioning

• How media controls public perception of veganism

You're right. Some examples of the moral implications of animal agriculture:

• https://dontwatch.org

• http://nationearth.com

• https://farmtransparency.org

• https://landofhopeandglory.org

• https://dominionmovement.com/watch

• https://mercyforanimals.org/investigations

• https://www.youtube.com/@animalAgricultureExposed

(Caution: Graphic)

That's right, and in terms of:

• land use

• Dead zones

• eutrophication

• Biodiversity loss

• Species extinction rates

• fresh water withdrawals

• Oceanic biomass depletion

Plant-based agriculture wins out by a long shot.

More data:

• Number of animals killed per one million calories 'harvested'

• Human rights issues in animal agriculture (sources included)