4gotOldU-name

4gotOldU-name t1_j9vt9ds wrote

That's ridiculous. There are a thousand other reasons she could have been killed that have nothing to do with being the father of that child besides "random". Or even her being pregnant.

The fact that you state that it being "random" is a possibility discounts there only being two other reasons (the ones you mentioned).

0

4gotOldU-name t1_j1yo7t8 wrote

>Experts in the adversarial system are likewise engaged in a d*ck swinging contest, with frequent attempts of lawyers and prosecutors trying to out-expert the expert in cross.

So, how scientific is a "dick swinging contest"?

Or an Op Ed from the Washington Post?

Both are behind pay walls, so wasn't able to read either.

1

4gotOldU-name t1_j1yhy8j wrote

My experience differs greatly from what you describe.

Was a juror in a high profile murder trial that eventually was a 20/20 episode (complete with horrific pictures of "shotgun vs. head"). It had none of the negative things you described.

Perhaps it is very different, depending on the state one is in?

4