1-more
1-more t1_itq1m93 wrote
Reply to comment by that-short-girl in PSA: Please stop calling these "Irish" sublegends. They are not Irish. by DiplomacyPunIn10Did
Huh yeah guess you can’t really count it as in there since it’s over the water next to Germany. I know it’s somewhat intelligible with Swedish is all. I am playing fast and loose with the definitions here to be charitable to the original commenter.
1-more t1_itq1a5z wrote
Reply to comment by sjuswede in PSA: Please stop calling these "Irish" sublegends. They are not Irish. by DiplomacyPunIn10Did
I mean that there are Southern Sámi (Uralic language) speakers within Sweden and Norway using ø as welll as the Swedish, Norwegian, and Faroese speakers using ø. The Southern Sámi speakers are within Scandinavia, but their language isn’t related to any Indo-European language (or we haven’t found a common ancestor yet). So you could call it a Scandinavian language in that it is located entirely within Scandinavia. But if you use Scandinavian to mean a language that is “northern Germanic and related to Faroese, Swedish, Danish, both Norwegians, etc” then that would be wrong.
1-more t1_itmlh3q wrote
Reply to comment by Varpie in PSA: Please stop calling these "Irish" sublegends. They are not Irish. by DiplomacyPunIn10Did
To be fair it takes some remembering to know which uses ø vs ö for “oe” and it’s complicated by œ being used in old Norse and æ being used in a bunch of them currently. Easy to remember that ø isn’t used outside of (geographically bounded) Scandinavia but hard to remember where specifically it is used within there.
1-more t1_itqcn9l wrote
Reply to comment by sjuswede in PSA: Please stop calling these "Irish" sublegends. They are not Irish. by DiplomacyPunIn10Did
Omg I’m a buffoon, I meant ö the entire time like a CHUMP. sorry I got gm that switched.