Amazing, you sourced three articles that all provided 0 links to studies, and all of which admitted that the best they have is “well maybe environment contributes” but they all admit that genetics is the only known issue.

Come back when you have an actual study, buddy. Until then, I’ll trust the actual medical school.

Source it then, I sourced mine.

The ‘increasing need for eye correction’ is due to better detection of poor vision.

Harvard states that eye exercises do not improve vision, and at absolute best only slightly delay the usage of corrective lenses, although they posit it’s more likely that, once lenses are worn, people acclimate to the improved vision, and no longer find their previous levels of vision acceptable.

https://www.health.harvard.edu/diseases-and-conditions/the-lowdown-on-eye-exercises

Saying it’s due to recent developments is like saying people are only developing celiac disease in the last few decades. People have had it for millennia, they just suffered without us knowing what caused it before.

“My source is I made it the fuck up

Buying is not funding it.

He gave money to people no longer associated with it (they took the money with them) in exchange for ownership of the company. No additional funds were injected into the company by the transaction, only the person at the top of the chain changed.

But this is the one who raised me.

Step 1: download trading app (Robinhood, Fidelity, Webull, TD Ameritrade, etc)

Step 2: create account.

Step 3: put some money in it.

Step 4: get approved for option trading.

Step 5: buy puts if you think it’s going down fast, calls if you think it’s going up fast.

Step 6: profit.

Now seriously though, don’t. Give it a lot of thought, don’t use money you can’t lose, and visit r/wallstreetbets to get an idea of how wrong options trades can go.

May wanna check the timestamps then, cause that’d mean I beat the other person.

Good call, updated it so it’s hopefully improved.

Or perhaps, it made the connection between punchline “holds its cards too close to its chest!”, the premise for the joke (not being invited to play poker) and a subject (an animal).

Much like a psychic does, it gave you a vague answer, and you made the connection and attributed intent of actions on its part in your mind.

Further proof is the person who repeated your test with another animal (to whom the posture would absolutely not apply) and it gave the same punchline, just with that animal.

It’d be a trapezoid then.

Sounds dubious at best.

Chloroform is slow-acting, and it would take at least a few minutes of breathing it to have it meaningfully affect a person.

Couple this with ingestion and absorption producing similar effects to inhalation, with the labia and vagina both falling more into the mucus membrane territory (read, absorbs faster than just skin) and they’d be knocking themselves out first.

Not to mention people overblow the impact of the records from Unit 731, at a minimum.

They told us nothing we didn’t already know, and bought war criminals pardons from justice.

Was gonna say, isn’t his name Jocko?

Edit: yep, just looked it up and confirmed it’s Jocko Willink, not Jacko.