---AI---

---AI--- t1_jdey54g wrote

Reply to comment by nightofgrim in [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501

GPT is really good at outputting json. Just tell it you want the output in json, and give an example.

So far in my testing, it's got a success rate of 100%, although I'm sure it may fail occasionally.

9

---AI--- t1_j7au2sj wrote

Reply to comment by Myxomatosiss in [D] Are large language models dangerous? by spiritus_dei

The Chinese room experiment is proof that a Chinese room can be sentient. There's no difference between a Chinese room and a human brain.

> It doesn't consider the context of the problem because it has no context.

I do not know what you mean here, so could you please give a specific example that you think ChatGPT and similar models will never be able to correctly answer.

2

---AI--- t1_j7a3hl0 wrote

Reply to comment by Myxomatosiss in [D] Are large language models dangerous? by spiritus_dei

>It doesn't think. It doesn't plan. It doesn't consider.

I want to know how you can prove these things. Because ChatGPT can most certainly at least "simulate" things. And if it can simulate them, how do you know it isn't "actually" doing them, or whether that question even makes sense?

Just ask it to do a task that a human would have to think plan and consider. A very simple example is to ask it to write a bit of code. That it can call and use functions before it has defined, it can open brackets planning ahead that will need to fill out that function there.

1

---AI--- t1_izutb4f wrote

Reply to [D] - Has Open AI said what ChatGPT's architecture is? What technique is it using to "remember" previous prompts? by 029187

You can ask it for a summary of the chat and it summaries the conversation. So this is some indication that it is probably summarizing the conversation as you go for the longer context, and using the full conversation for the previous last few messages.

Try making a long conversation and then asking it what the first message was

12

---AI--- t1_iwtd2xx wrote

Reply to comment by dat_cosmo_cat in [R] The Near Future of AI is Action-Driven by hardmaru

But they are useful. Look at the thousands of real world uses. Look at grammerly, translation, protein folding, and so on. How can you possibly deny it?!

> not fundamentally better

In just the last two years, the models went from scoring 43 on this system of testing to 75. How much more of a fundamental improvement are you after?!

1